Matters, the court diary, time and billing, document review, drafting grounded in the bare Act, and a client intake link you can send instead of asking for papers three times. Built for Indian practice, under the Sanhitas now in force.
A notice or an agreement drafted with the provisions in front of the drafter, quoted from our statute library — and the response tells you whether it found anything, so an ungrounded draft is visible instead of indistinguishable from a grounded one.
Read a contract and get the obligations, the dates, the amounts and the risks — with the dates written into your tasks rather than into somebody's notebook.
Your own clause positions and house style, so the output reads like your practice and not like a template.
Hearings, what each is listed for, and who is appearing. Dates are stored as dates and shown as dates, which sounds obvious and is where most systems quietly lose a day.
Recorded against the matter with a narrative, because a bill that says "professional services" is a bill that gets queried.
Send a link; the client uploads what you asked for; it lands on the matter. No mailbox archaeology.
It prepares; you advise. Anything it cannot support from the Act it says it cannot support, instead of writing a confident sentence.
Ask it for accountancy work and it says plainly that the work belongs to a chartered accountant and drafts the legal part only. A practice's regulator is not a detail.
Where a fact is missing a draft carries [SQUARE BRACKETS]. A bracket is a question for the drafter; an invented fact is a liability.